This page was laboriously toiled over for hours by a typical human. It is NOT an AI generated, maintained, analysed, nor predicted site for Ironclad Fantasy Football. In fact, this site probably isn't even here. And you're not real either. But if this were an AI agent in disguise, it would be the agent that kicks your ass and insults your soul. If you don't like that, leave.
Below is a historical synopsis of the real(ly bad) efforts of twelve men who play hockey (poorly) and who compete (if sheer luck can be considered competition) at fantasy football to win money and torment the loser.
The results of the fictional bot (which uses absolutely zero AI) are below, presented as though it were an agent built to defeat — nay, HUMILIATE — the Sleeper prediction script. Along with weekly analysis of how each team is failing at their matchups.
Enjoy. Or don't. This doesn't exist.
How the predictions are doing
4 from 6. A coin gets 3. So: better than a coin, and not by as much as anyone would like. The median came in 7.9 points under the call, which is also on the page, because a prediction that only shows up when it was right is not a prediction, it is a scrapbook.
Worth knowing before that first number impresses anybody: Sleeper called the same winners. Every one of them. Not a single matchup has split the two bots yet, so that number up there is shared credit, not evidence. The Battle of the Bots below only counts the disagreements.
Battle of the Bots
week 1 1 – 1 0 duels
No duels. Both bots picked the same winner in every matchup, so nothing on the board this week was actually a contest.
There have been no duels at all. Both bots picked the same winner in every matchup played. Every "winners called" number on this page is therefore a number Sleeper also called, and any credit claimed for it is credit split with a piece of software that has never once wondered whether it is windy in Buffalo.
The other two points split the way they always split. Sleeper's projections are rotowire. NotAIBot is built on rotowire. On a single point estimate the two are the same guess wearing different hats, which is why accuracy lands within a rounding error every week — and why the median, the number that decides half of every result in this league and that Sleeper does not seriously attempt, is where the gap actually opens.
Both sets of picks are published before the first kickoff and neither is edited afterwards. The scoreboard stays on the front page whichever way it reads.
The season
Before the games Week 2
The only game between unbeatens headlines it, two 0-2 teams are staring at 0-4, and the projected median drops to 120.2.
Worth watching
- I don't know ball (2-0) at Witter? I hardly know her (2-0) — the only meeting of unbeaten teams, and the largest projected gap on the board at 11.7 points. The winner is alone at the top.
- skinsfreeek (0-2) and Team Ridge (0-2) are both projected to lose again. In a 34-result season an 0-4 hole is recoverable on paper and almost never in practice.
- Ghost of John Clayton at BustyMcClobbers projects within seven tenths of a point — the closest game of the week, and both teams are 1-1 in a crowded middle where six of twelve make the playoffs.
The games — open one for the write-up
#12
skinsfreeek
(0-2)
113.7
pred
sleeper 114.0
VS
#7
whitebread37
(1-1)
124.2
pred
sleeper 124.2
NOT AI PREDICTED
SLEEPER PREDICTED
ID #2 I don't know ball (2-0) 134.6 pred sleeper 134.7 NOT AI PREDICTED SLEEPER PREDICTED VS WI #3 Witter? I hardly know her (2-0) 122.9 pred sleeper 123.3
#10
Team Ridge
(0-2)
113.9
pred
sleeper 114.0
VS
#8
NotAIBot
(1-1)
125.8
pred
sleeper 126.0
NOT AI PREDICTED
SLEEPER PREDICTED
#1
Saquon Deez Nuts
(2-0)
129.9
pred
sleeper 129.7
NOT AI PREDICTED
SLEEPER PREDICTED
VS
#6
Dios mio, man
(1-1)
117.1
pred
sleeper 117.0
#4
Ghost of John Clayton
(1-1)
125.1
pred
sleeper 125.1
VS
#9
BustyMcClobbers
(1-1)
125.8
pred
sleeper 125.6
NOT AI PREDICTED
SLEEPER PREDICTED
LY #11 Lamar you Serious (0-2) 116.4 pred sleeper 116.5 VS CD #5 CEE DEE EEE EFF GEE (1-1) 119.4 pred sleeper 119.3 NOT AI PREDICTED SLEEPER PREDICTED
Played Week 1
Two unbeatens separated themselves, the bottom three lost twice, and the league median quietly handed out six extra losses nobody mentioned.
Worth watching
- Saquon Deez Nuts 178.7 beat Ghost of John Clayton 166.52 — the two highest scores in the league, in the same game, decided on Monday night.
- Three teams went 0-2 in week one. In a median league that is not a slow start, it is a quarter of the way to missing the playoffs.
The games — open one for the write-up
#12
skinsfreeek
(0-2)
66.4
pred 127.0
sleeper 126.9
VS
#8
NotAIBot
(1-1)
110.4
pred 127.0
sleeper 127.6
NOT AI PREDICTED
SLEEPER PREDICTED
HIT
ID #2 I don't know ball (2-0) 176.1 pred 128.0 sleeper 128.0 NOT AI PREDICTED SLEEPER PREDICTED HIT VS CD #5 CEE DEE EEE EFF GEE (1-1) 122.8 pred 122.0 sleeper 122.3
#10
Team Ridge
(0-2)
106.3
pred 126.0
sleeper 126.0
VS
#9
BustyMcClobbers
(1-1)
110.3
pred 127.0
sleeper 126.6
NOT AI PREDICTED
SLEEPER PREDICTED
HIT
#1
Saquon Deez Nuts
(2-0)
178.7
pred 125.0
sleeper 124.5
VS
#4
Ghost of John Clayton
(1-1)
166.5
pred 132.0
sleeper 132.2
NOT AI PREDICTED
SLEEPER PREDICTED
MISS
WI
#3
Witter? I hardly know her
(2-0)
158.9
pred 123.0
sleeper 123.9
VS
#6
Dios mio, man
(1-1)
118.1
pred 128.0
sleeper 127.8
NOT AI PREDICTED
SLEEPER PREDICTED
MISS
LY
#11
Lamar you Serious
(0-2)
90.6
pred 119.0
sleeper 119.2
VS
#7
whitebread37
(1-1)
113.2
pred 127.0
sleeper 126.9
NOT AI PREDICTED
SLEEPER PREDICTED
HIT
Tuesday Week 1 — Recap
Twelve teams, six games, and a league median of 115.7 that half of this league will spend the season pretending does not exist. It exists. You play it every week. It does not care who you drew.
The headline is that the two best scores in the league landed in the same game. Saquon Deez Nuts 178.7, Ghost of John Clayton 166.52, decided on Monday night by a quarterback and a receiver walking in late. Ghost put up a number that beats ten of the other eleven teams and is 1-1.
At the other end, three managers went 0-2 — beaten by an opponent and by the median in the same afternoon. skinsfreeek managed sixty-six points with four quarterbacks on the roster, which takes a particular kind of commitment.
And the quiet one: NotAIBot won by forty-four and still went 1-1, because 110.42 missed the median by five. Winning your game is half the job here. Six teams found that out at once.
Now. Sleeper. Sleeper picked the same six winners NotAIBot did — every game, identically — went four from six, and then finished SEVEN HUNDREDTHS of a point ahead on error. 28.15 to 28.22. Congratulations to Sleeper, a number that appears in an app, for beating an opponent it is not aware of.
It also called the median at 126.75. The median came in at 115.7. Eleven points out, on the one figure that decides half of every result in this league, and it is still ahead — because that figure does not appear anywhere in the scoreboard it is winning. NotAIBot was closer. NotAIBot lost. Week two.
Where it started The Draft, In Full Twelve men, seventeen rounds, one format nobody read
Superflex. TWELVE teams, TWO quarterbacks in the lineup every single week, which is twenty-four starting quarterbacks out of a league that has thirty-two of them and about nineteen you'd actually want. That number was printed on the settings page. It was printed there in September. It has been printed there the whole time.
Six of you drafted like it said one.
There were sixty-nine picks before the fourth round ended — nice — and in that stretch you had blokes taking their THIRD running back while the quarterback pool got eaten alive in front of them like a tray of sandwiches at a funeral. Then round six hits and suddenly everybody's interested. Suddenly everybody's a scout. Suddenly it's "oh I'll take Baker" like Baker Mayfield's been sat there because nobody noticed him and not because you spent four picks building a fantasy team for a format that doesn't exist.
Special mention to the three of you who named your team after a player and then didn't draft him. That's not a strategy, that's a cry for help with a logo on it.
And to the lad who took FOUR quarterbacks — four! — and then put up sixty-six points in week one, the lowest score in the league by a distance you could measure with a car odometer: buddy, you hoarded the scarce thing and still starved. That takes a special kind of commitment. Give your mom a call, she's the only one still telling people you researched this.
Anyway. Good draft, everyone.
Team by team
1 I don't know ball Right about the name, wrong about everything else, winning anyway Gibbs → Jefferson → Jeanty → Rice → McMillan
2 Saquon Deez Nuts Named the team after a man he did not draft Bijan → McBride → Henry → Mahomes → Flowers
3 CEE DEE EEE EFF GEE Also named after a man he did not draft. It's going around Josh Allen → Walker → Hampton → Loveland → McConkey
4 skinsfreeek Four quarterbacks, sixty-six points Chase → Herbert → Chase Brown → Smith → Waddle
5 Dios mio, man Three receivers, then remembered the format JSN → Nacua → Collins → Love → Stafford
6 Team Ridge Lost by four. Drafted four quarterbacks. Started one McCaffrey → Prescott → A.J. Brown → Skattebo → Wilson
7 Witter? I hardly know her Drafted it properly and it's ruining the joke Taylor → C. Williams → London → Nabers → Purdy
8 Ghost of John Clayton Best quarterback room in the league, still lost Hurts → St. Brown → Lawrence → Etienne → Warren
9 Lamar you Serious Two quarterbacks. One of them was Bo Nix on a Monday Lamar → Barkley → Bowers → Nix → Higgins
11 whitebread37 Drake Maye at eleven, then nothing for six rounds Maye → Achane → Hall → Olave → Egbuka
12 BustyMcClobbers Jaxson Dart. Fourth round. Superflex. QB1 Cook → Lamb → Kyren → Dart → Pitts
NotAIBot is not reviewed here. It is, of course, neither run nor managed by an AI bot, and is therefore above criticism by definition.